Some people believe that the Stiff-Legged Bear/Big Man-Eater figures are a representation of
mastodons or woolly mammoths, still preserved in Native American stories thousands of years
after they became extinct. Ideas supporting such a connection include:
*Some southeastern Native American people used their native word for Big Man-Eater when
they first saw African elephants.
*Elephants have a peculiarly stiff-legged gait, with their legs positioned vertically directly
underneath their body, different from other animals such as bears.
*Elephants have proportionately very large heads compared with animals like bears. Stiff-legged Bear
is usually described as having a large head.
*Stiff-Legged Bear/Big Man-Eater is frequently described as similar in size and strength to
a mastodon. (Modern elephants can push over trees as the monster was said to.)
However, there are also several ideas arguing against Stiff-Legged Bear being any kind of
*Native American storytellers in most tribes described the creature as being a giant bear-- a
creature these cultures were very familiar with and could hardly have confused for an elephant.
*In every story we know of, Stiff-Legged Bear/Big Man-Eater is a carnivore that eats people.
Elephants are vegetarians. The Paleo-Indian ancestors of the storytellers were hunters of
mammoths/mastodons, not their prey. Surely if a cultural memory of an extinct animal had really
survived for thousands of years, something as culturally important as the animal's basic relationship
with their ancestors would have been more accurately remembered than the shape of the animal's legs.
*Stiff-Legged Bear is never mentioned as having a trunk. How could anybody describe an elephant
without mentioning its most distinctive feature?
There is a another related possibility, which is that the Stiff-Legged Bear myth might have been
based on mammoth/mastodon fossils which Native Americans had unearthed. This kind of thing
has been known to happen before, with dinosaur fossils reported as dragon bones in both Europe
and Asia. An elephant's large head and stiff legs could be observed by looking at its skeleton,
whereas its trunk would not be preserved. Furthermore, mastodons have sharp teeth-- 18th-century
scientists thought it might have been carnivorous for that reason, so Native Americans who came
across mastodon fossils might have made the same mistake. (Here is a
photograph of a mastodon skull
where you can see its teeth.)
The third possibility, of course, is that the Stiff-Legged Bear is not based on an elephant at all and is exactly
what the storytellers describe it as: a mythological bear the size of an elephant. Bears would have
been a lot more familiar to Native American storytellers and audiences than long-extinct animals
or even fossils, and it is very common worldwide for mythological monsters to be giant versions of
At any rate, whatever the inspiration for the Stiff-Legged Bear stories was, they
are told in many different tribes throughout North America, particularly in the northern and eastern
parts of the continent.